Week 6: MCP, Evaluation, and LLMOps
Evaluation, Tracing, and Token Accountability
If you only inspect outcomes manually, you are flying blind.
Week 6: MCP, Evaluation, and LLMOps
If you only inspect outcomes manually, you are flying blind.
Objective
Design evaluation and tracing practices that let you monitor quality, cost, and failure patterns.The lesson is public. The pressure loop lives inside the app where submissions, revision, and review happen.
Deliverable
An evaluation scorecard and post-launch monitoring plan.Each lesson contributes to a week-level artifact and eventually to the shipped AI-native SaaS.
Preview
Lesson Preview
If you only inspect outcomes manually, you are flying blind.
This lesson teaches how to make AI system quality visible through traces, evals, and cost-aware instrumentation.
Without structured evaluation, teams mistake vivid examples for real quality. Without traces and cost telemetry, they cannot explain regressions or runaway spend.
Observability answers what happened. Evaluation answers whether it was good. Cost accountability answers whether it was worth it.
What This Is
This lesson teaches how to make AI system quality visible through traces, evals, and cost-aware instrumentation.
Why This Matters in Production
Without structured evaluation, teams mistake vivid examples for real quality. Without traces and cost telemetry, they cannot explain regressions or runaway spend.
Mental Model
Observability answers what happened. Evaluation answers whether it was good. Cost accountability answers whether it was worth it.
Deep Dive
A mature AI system records enough context to reconstruct requests, prompts, retrieved evidence, tool calls, and outcomes without leaking inappropriate data. Evaluation scorecards turn vague “seems better” language into explicit axes such as factuality, rubric adherence, latency, and revision rate. Token and cost tracking matter because product viability depends on the economics of the interaction, not only its elegance.
Worked Example
A review model starts producing overly harsh feedback after a prompt revision. Traces reveal the new prompt version, evaluation scorecards reveal a drop in helpfulness, and cost metrics reveal the change also increased output tokens unnecessarily.
Common Failure Modes
Common failures include collecting traces with no retrieval or prompt version, manually eyeballing a few examples instead of defining a test set, and ignoring token cost until the bill arrives.
References
official-doc
Use this to ground tracing concepts.
Open referenceofficial-doc
Tie evaluation thinking to provider guidance.
Open referenceofficial-doc
Useful comparison point for metrics and experiment discipline.
Open reference